Hi-Ho, the Glamorous Life: Less than the Minimum

Marissa Skudlarek wrestles with some big questions about how we make art and uphold out political/fiscal ideals in a society where funding for the arts is so hard to come by.

Conservatives sometimes condescend to liberals by telling them that their idealistic sentiments are very noble and all, but they’re impractical for the real world. “If you’re a conservative at twenty, you have no heart; if you’re a liberal at fifty, you have no brain,” they say. Isn’t it precious that these sweet young things want to raise the minimum wage and implement universal health care? Isn’t it adorably naïve that they don’t know the harm that that would cause?

Such condescension has always irritated me, as it’s designed to do. It’s so cynical and defeatist, telling us that society just naturally chews up and spits out its poorest and weakest citizens, and nothing can be done to stop this.

Like all young idealists, then, I vowed that I would do better. If I were ever in a position of power, if I ever became an entrepreneur or a “job creator,” I would prove that you can run a successful business on liberal principles. In the meantime, I would stand in solidarity with all those individuals working to promote fairer wages and less inequality: the fast-food workers across America, the airport workers at SEA-TAC, the unpaid interns whose bushy-tailed enthusiasm is so frequently abused.

But now, I’m in a position where I need to get a lot of people to sign on to a project that I’m putting together: the play that I am self-producing this summer. And, well, I’m not revising my larger political views, but I’ve discovered that I need to make compromises, and abandon some of my most fiercely held (but most naïve) beliefs.

The play I’m producing requires nine actors, which is considered a large cast these days. (As a playwright, I love writing large-cast plays and hate that the economics of the American theater discourage this. As a producer, I’m starting to see why “smaller is better.”) Nine actors, plus a director, set and lighting designers, a stage manager, possibly other techies… that’s a lot of people, working long hours to put this show together. So, in doing my initial back-of-the-envelope budget calculations, I quickly realized that I cannot afford to pay my collaborators minimum wage. I can pay them a stipend of a few hundred dollars, which is in line with what other indie theaters pay. But to pay minimum wage would amount to about $1000 per actor, once all rehearsals and performances are factored in.

I had a mini-crisis upon seeing these cruel numbers and realizing the impossibility of changing the system single-handedly. I had honestly thought that I could succeed where others had failed! I had thought that I could support labor, support the arts, support fairness and justice, by following my ideals and paying minimum wage.

In distress, I asked some of my more experienced friends what I should do. One replied, basically, “Is this the hill you want to die on?” He suggested that if I were founding a theater company that regularly produced shows, I might have reason to be concerned about actor salaries; but because the play I’m producing is a one-off, I shouldn’t make “minimum wage” my primary concern.

Another friend tried to get me to see the distinction between McDonalds or Wal-Mart, on the one hand, and myself on the other hand. It is immoral for a CEO to refuse to pay workers a living wage when the company is raking in millions of dollars in profit; but it is not immoral for a self-producing theater artist, who certainly isn’t getting rich from this endeavor, to pay her collaborators a stipend in line with what she can afford. My paying my collaborators minimum wage won’t do anything to solve the larger problem of how to afford to make art in an expensive city like San Francisco. It would be a grand gesture, but it wouldn’t have a real effect on the overall system.

As I was writing this column, someone I follow on Twitter posted a quote by Jessica Mitford: “You may not be able to change the world, but at least you can embarrass the guilty.” It was exactly what I needed to see at this moment. Mitford was a remarkable woman: born into the English aristocracy, she ran away from home to support the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War, and eventually ended up in the Bay Area, working as a muckraking journalist. Yet even she realized that one needs to balance idealism and pragmatism. I may not be able to change the world, but I can use this column to start a conversation, and I can continue to advocate in other ways for a fairer society. It’s the least that I can do.

Marissa Skudlarek is a San Francisco-based playwright and arts writer. She’s putting together a production of her play “Pleiades” for summer 2014. For more, visit marissabidilla.blogspot.com or @MarissaSkud on Twitter.

8 comments on “Hi-Ho, the Glamorous Life: Less than the Minimum

  1. As people wiser-than-myself have said: Art is done for the love and experience; not the money. Having said that, a business can and should pay its workers. I was at WonderCon several years back and attended a panel of former Disney artists and animators who were there to honour artist Mary Blair. They said of both her experiences and their own with the company: “We loved making such wonderful artwork every single day.” BUT… ” ‘Uncle Walt’ did NOT like unions.” They went on to describe him feeling betrayed by the animators when they asked for living wages, because how dare they not accept payment of taking part in his imagination.

    But you’re a single writer/producer, not the Svengali of a multimillion dollar corporation. I think your collaborators will trust you enough that you have a vision to see through and don’t merely think of them as attractive indentured servants.

    • I hope so! And I want to be honest and up-front with everyone about what I expect from them and what they can expect from me. The attitude should be more “We’re all in this together, it’s not a big-budget project but I can afford to give you $X as payment” and less “I am a visionary genius and you’re lucky to get $X from me!”

  2. Valerie Weak says:

    Marissa – thanks for sharing this and sharing this struggle. FWIW, the MBAT contract (lowest tier equity contract in the region) is based on paying minimum wage to the actor.

    • Thanks for commenting, Valerie. Yes, I’d be very surprised if Equity ever permitted its actors to work for less than minimum wage.

      • Valerie Weak says:

        The BAPP (which is a code, not a contract), allows a Bay Area producer to work with an Equity actor and only pay them a stipend. There are restrictions on rehearsal time and # of performances per week. There is also a Staged Reading Code, which lets AEA members work for stipend on a staged reading. And, if a project that is raising funds for charity works with the Theatre Authority, they may be able to set things up so that an actor is reimbursed for travel only, but donates their time.

  3. thanks for the clarification Valerie!

  4. […] last column touched on the interesting problem of paying actors. When she talked about paying actors a minimum […]

  5. That is really interesting, You’re an overly skilled blogger.

    I’ve joined your rss feed and stay up for in the hunt for more of your wonderful post.
    Additionally, I’ve shared your site in my social networks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s